DATA & FIGURES
$5/monthly and $15/monthly support options are available for the Guardian, with benefits including ad-free reading and unlimited access to the premium Guardian app. The US and China are among the countries urged to agree on international rules for AI, with Cooper citing the need for a new, structured relationship with Europe and a more European Nato at its core.
THE SCENARIO
The world is facing a range of threats, including the combined risks of AI, climate crisis, irregular migration, and foreign interference, which are threatening global security and western liberal democracy. The US is seen as withdrawing from its role as a global arbiter, and the UK and EU need to negotiate a more permanent settlement and develop a new, structured relationship with Europe.
DIRECT QUOTE
"On nuclear, international agreement came only after the world saw the terrifying power of the new technology at Hiroshima – and asked what would happen if it fell into the wrong hands. We cannot afford to wait for an AI equivalent of Hiroshima before we act." — Yvette Cooper, UK Foreign Secretary
BBN INSIGHT
The Positive Side: Cooper's warning highlights the need for international cooperation and agreement on regulating AI, which could lead to a more stable and secure world. The Negative Side: The lack of regulation and agreement on AI poses a significant threat to humanity, and the world may be forced to wait for an AI equivalent of Hiroshima before taking action, which could have devastating consequences. The impact on everyday people could be significant, with the potential for job losses, increased surveillance, and decreased privacy.